[funsec] Microsoft trying to put F.U.D. on Guilfanov 'temporary' p atch

Barrie Dempster barrie at reboot-robot.net
Tue Jan 3 16:05:10 CST 2006

On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 21:47 +0000, Fergie wrote:
> It just sounded very negative.
> Understandable, I suppose.
> Having said that, I certainly wouldn't wait for another 7 days
> to at least put into place a temporary patch, but that's just
> me.  :-)

Neither would I. Although, as much as I trust the fix I doubt most
administrators could get away with that on their networks as it's
hopefully within their policies that any fixes are both vendor and
in-house tested before widespread installation. Similarly if you
suddenly had problems with an ISVs software after installing a 3rd party
patch to Windows, I doubt they'd be willing to support you with it.

On my own machine I might apply a 3rd party patch, providing I have the
source code of course. On a large production network I'd need vendor
approval and support before I'd go near it.

With Regards..
Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue

"He who hingeth aboot, geteth hee-haw" Victor - Still Game

blog:  http://reboot-robot.net
sites: http://www.bsrf.org.uk - http://www.security-forums.com
ca:    https://www.cacert.org/index.php?id=3
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 1859 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://linuxbox.org/pipermail/funsec/attachments/20060103/27473969/smime-0001.bin

More information about the funsec mailing list