[funsec] RE: [Full-disclosure] Urgent Alert: Possible BlackWorm

[Xyberpix]

nia worm?

xyberpix

On Fri Jan 27 14:15 , 'Todd Towles' <toddtowles at brookshires.com> sent:

>Ok, somehow that Wikipedia article reminds me of the old days but
>whatever.
>
>Is there a new term for non-interaction automatic worm? Should we make
>one?
>
>-Todd
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: full-disclosure-bounces at lists.grok.org.uk 
>> [full-disclosure-bounces at lists.grok.org.uk] On Behalf 
>> Of Holger van Lengerich
>> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 4:27 AM
>> To: Dude VanWinkle
>> Cc: funsec at linuxbox.org; full-disclosure at lists.grok.org.uk; 
>> bugtraq at securityfocus.com; Gadi Evron
>> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Urgent Alert: Possible 
>> BlackWorm DDay February3rd (Snort signatures included)
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 01:52:39PM -0500, Dude VanWinkle wrote:
>> > On 1/24/06, Gadi Evron ge at linuxbox.org> wrote:
>> 
>> > > now known as the TISF BlackWorm task force.
>> 
>> > Why do you call a .scr you have to manually install a 
>> "worm"? Why not 
>> > "BlackVirus"
>> 
>> RTFW: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_worm
>> 
>> :)
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Holger
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
>https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
>Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.