[funsec] Diamond in the Rough: U.S. Congress Mulls Slew of
Net-SexRules
Nervox Nervox
nervox.nosecurity at gmail.com
Thu Jun 29 03:45:44 CDT 2006
What happened with sony ?You mean to say that audio CD that don't work
with cdplayer is something wrong ?
I would sue anyone using my PC against my will even the US gov.Plus
did they think that diffrent OS mean diffrent BOT?I mean try to break
my OpenBSD box i dare them to actually see my box .
>>Restricting naughty Webcams
Bad Bad webcam ,
>>Making certain hyperlinks illegal
How hard would be for ppl to start using proxy and bounce off .ru or
other unregulated country ?
There are a hundred other ways far more effective (some have been
mentionned here) :
>>1: Shut down myspace
>>2: Shut down AOL teen chat
Wich are very valid and easy to do solutions.
>>3: Start castrating repeat sex offenders
This is being tested in some countries (chemical castration).
Best Regards Nervox.
On 6/28/06, Blanchard_Michael at emc.com <Blanchard_Michael at emc.com> wrote:
> Hehehe.... I can see that happening too....
>
> How are they going to tell the difference between that new Aerosmith song my wife just BOUGHT the MP3 of and the one a college kid downloaded illegally? The gov will destroy both of them.... What about other countries? How long will it take for AV to pick up the 'bot?
>
> Doesn't the gov remember what happened with Sony just a few months ago??????
>
>
>
>
> Michael P. Blanchard
> Antivirus / Security Engineer, CISSP, GCIH, CCSA-NGX, MCSE
> Office of Information Security & Risk Management
> EMC ² Corporation
> 4400 Computer Dr.
> Westboro, MA 01580
> Office: (508)898-7102
> Cell: (508)958-2780
> Pager: (877)552-3945
> email: Blanchard_Michael at EMC.COM
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: funsec-bounces at linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-bounces at linuxbox.org] On Behalf Of Fergie
> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 6:17 PM
> To: funsec at linuxbox.org
> Subject: [funsec] Diamond in the Rough: U.S. Congress Mulls Slew of Net-SexRules
>
> I'll only quote one paragraph of this article, which I think is
> a shining example of how whacked our U.S. lawmakers are:
>
> [snip]
>
> Dispatching "search and destroy" bots: The idea of disrupting
> peer-to-peer networks surfaced in 2002 in the House of Representatives,
> and Sen. Orrin Hatch said a year later that copyright holders should be
> allowed to remotely destroy the computers of music pirates. Now Rep.
> Walden has revived that idea, proposing that search and destroy bots be
> launched to scour the Internet for illicit content.
>
> "If you could search for different things, you might be able to search
> for a known image, identify it and destroy it," Walden suggested. He
> dubbed the idea "technologically scan and destroy."
>
>
> [snip]
>
> Freekin' amazing.
>
> After you've finished laughing, you can read this reast of their
> bright ideas here:
>
> http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6088627.html
>
> Enjoy. :-)
>
> - ferg
>
>
> --
> "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
> Engineering Architecture for the Internet
> fergdawg at netzero.net or fergdawg at sbcglobal.net
> ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
>
More information about the funsec
mailing list