[funsec] Spamhaus Ignores U.S. Court?
dudevanwinkle at gmail.com
Mon Sep 18 19:02:13 CDT 2006
On 9/18/06, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:30:11 EDT, Dude VanWinkle said:
> > Getting back to the thread though: Vixie said:
> > "last but not least, i want steve linford to be welcome at NANOG and IETF
> > meetings held in the US (and even those held in indiana, if ever.) having
> > him taken from the airport in handcuffs would be a real buzz-killer for me."
> > Is that a possibility? Did Spamhaus break the law by not being in the
> > courts jurisdiction?
> Adobe. ROT-13. Skylarov. DMCA.
You mean this guy http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-530420.html ?
holy crap! If its even possible, I dislike adobe even more than before
I read the article.
If a stanford law professor says you are innocent, and the DMCA keeps
you in jail, I would call that definitive proof that cash runs our
-JP<and to make this post fun
More information about the funsec