[funsec] Where does the Republican Party stand on the 1st Amendment?

William Lefkovics william at emailonastick.com
Sun Jul 20 01:42:15 CDT 2008

Blogs are not the same as Blog comments.  Though there are many blog comment
entries I don't read because it is too much effort to have to scroll down to
find the most recent post. 

Thankfully blogs themselves have the most recent entry top posted. 

There really isn't a right or wrong answer, I think.  We are asserting a
preference. If I can not gather a reasonable response from the first few
lines or even in a preview pane scenario, I may miss the entire post. I
realize this is my choosing and realize it is of little concern to the
poster if I don't read the message.

-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces at linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-bounces at linuxbox.org] On
Behalf Of Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 11:15 PM
To: Richard M. Smith
Cc: 'funsec'
Subject: Re: [funsec] Where does the Republican Party stand on the 1st

On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:25:55 EDT, "Richard M. Smith" said:
> >>> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.

OK, we'll try it your way. This morning's Roanoke Times lead story,
converted to top-posting, where the references appear before the referents:

"The wreck closed all lanes of U.S. 220 indefinitely as of 11 p.m. The
closure affected northbound lanes from the Wonju Street exit to the Elm
Avenue exit and all southbound lanes from the Elm Avenue exit to the
Franklin Road exit near Tanglewood Mall.

Many people stopped their cars and pedestrians lined up to observe the
dramatic scene as the fire burned on an embankment near railroad tracks off
Reserve Avenue.

Police spokeswoman Aisha Johnson said EMS personnel had not located the
driver and could not get close enough to the scene to determine whether any
other vehicles were involved late Saturday night.

A tanker truck traveling northbound on U.S. 220 went over an embankment just
before the Franklin Road exit near Old Southwest and caught fire about 10
Saturday, according to Roanoke police."

No - newspapers tend to write the main point in the *first* paragraph, and
then things that expand on and comment on it appear *under* it - they are
*bottom* posted.

> Really?  Newspaper articles,

Oddly enough, Boing Boing, Bruce Schneier and Crooks&Liars all thread the
comments bottom posted, as do *most* of the blogs I read. So it's hardly

> blogs,


> posted.  Want to try again?

More information about the funsec mailing list