[funsec] Rethinking FUNSEC

Alex Eckelberry AlexE at sunbelt-software.com
Thu Nov 19 17:03:27 CST 2009


I hereby retract all the comments I've made about Gartner. 



-----Original Message-----
From: funsec-bounces at linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-bounces at linuxbox.org]
On Behalf Of Blue Boar
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 5:13 PM
To: Michael Graham
Cc: funsec at linuxbox.org
Subject: Re: [funsec] Rethinking FUNSEC

http://seclists.org/funsec/

					BB

Michael Graham wrote:
> Ya if someone were to publicize funsec, what the hell would larry have
> left for his column?
> 
> Sorry but this material has already been commercialized please find
other.
> 
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Larry Seltzer
<larry at larryseltzer.com
> <mailto:larry at larryseltzer.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Chill Barry.
> 
>     Everyone back to work. Nothing to see here.
> 
>     Larry Seltzer
>     Contributing Editor, PC Magazine
>     larry_seltzer at ziffdavis.com <mailto:larry_seltzer at ziffdavis.com>
>     http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/
> 
> 
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: funsec-bounces at linuxbox.org
>     <mailto:funsec-bounces at linuxbox.org>
>     [mailto:funsec-bounces at linuxbox.org
>     <mailto:funsec-bounces at linuxbox.org>]
>     On Behalf Of Barry Raveendran Greene
>     Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 2:53 PM
>     To: funsec at linuxbox.org <mailto:funsec at linuxbox.org>
>     Subject: [funsec] Rethinking FUNSEC
> 
>     Hi Team,
> 
>     IMHO, the garbage in the press are influencing policy makers in
>     governments
>     and corporations to the wrong conclusions. Conclusions which lead
to
>     actions
>     which is not addressing the reality of the threats. This is now
not
>     something to be laughed at, but something which is hurting the
industry.
> 
>     I'm already started to tear into articles which as flawed, not
>     researched,
>     and garbage. I will continue to do that.
> 
>     But we have another option - take the FUNSEC dialog public. This
is not
>     opening the list, this is taking these conversations - which deal
with
>     critiquing press articles -  public and searchable.
> 
>     Thoughts?
> 
>     Barry
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
>     https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
>     Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
>     https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
>     Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
> 
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.



More information about the funsec mailing list