[funsec] Adobe investigates sophisticatic corporate networksecurity issue
eslerj at gmail.com
Wed Jan 13 12:28:33 CST 2010
Did anyone else think that there are two parts to that Google attack?
Spearphishing, and it just seemed like there was another part, the part
involving other companies?
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Juha-Matti Laurio <
juha-matti.laurio at netti.fi> wrote:
> Yes, I heard this but without Internet connection I had no change to check
> these references.
> A good coverage is located at
> Larry Seltzer [larry at larryseltzer.com] kirjoitti:
> > Both iDefense and F-Secure are saying the Google attack and associated
> > attacks were using the most recent PDF 0-day, the December 15 one.
> > Larry Seltzer
> > Contributing Editor, PC Magazine
> > larry_seltzer at ziffdavis.com
> > http://blogs.pcmag.com/securitywatch/
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: funsec-bounces at linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-bounces at linuxbox.org]
> > On Behalf Of Juha-Matti Laurio
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 9:20 AM
> > To: funsec at linuxbox.org
> > Subject: [funsec] Adobe investigates sophisticatic corporate
> > networksecurity issue
> > http://blogs.adobe.com/conversations/2010/01/adobe_investigates_corporat
> > e_n.html
> > "Adobe became aware on January 2, 2010 of a computer security incident
> > involving a sophisticated, coordinated attack
> > against corporate network systems managed by Adobe and other companies.
> > We are currently in contact with other companies and are investigating
> > the incident."
> > Blog entry was posted yesterday.
> > Was the attack vector possibly a pdf document exploiting Adobe 0-day
> > reported mid-December? :(
> > Juha-Matti
> > _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the funsec